Decline social Security
(MoneyWatch) In spite of reports you might read in the media, Social Security's funding challenges aren't caused by people living longer, the way the federal programs' Trust Fund is invested or by the nation's large public debt.
The real reason for the pending funding crunch? People are having fewer children, said Steve Goss, the Social Security Administration's chief actuary recently at the annual meeting of the Society of Actuaries in San Diego.
Goss and his team of actuaries project that benefits paid to retirees and other beneficiaries will rise from a current level of roughly 5 percent of GDP to a little more than 6 percent of GDP by 2030. This projected cost is then projected to remain roughly level for the next 60 years, as shown in the chart below.
Of course, Social Security's cost as a percentage of GDP will grow during the next couple of decades because benefits are projected to grow faster than the U.S. economy. The economy would expand faster if more people were entering the workforce, but recent declines in the birth rate are slowing GDP growth.
The dotted line shows the total number of children born per each woman, while the solid line represents the number of children born who survive to age 10. This latter number better represents the potential number of people who will eventually enter the workforce. These two numbers have converged since the 1930s as modern medicine has dramatically reduced deaths among infants and small children.
Since the 1960s, however, the birth rate has declined by about one-third, from three children per woman to two. This represents a major change in the age distribution of our country. As a result, we will have a lot fewer people producing goods and services and paying payroll taxes into Social Security relative to the number of retirees who are just consumers.
The chart below shows the increase in what is known as the "aged dependency" ratio - the number of people in the Social Security population age 65 and older, compared to the number of people in the Social Security population who have the potential to work and support the system by paying taxes (defined as those age 20 to 64). This ratio, which has a significant impact on Social Security's long-term costs, remained level from 1975 to 2010. But it is projected to increase from its current level of 0.2 to about 0.35 by 2030.
You might also like
Where did your Tax Money go?by weepingjesus
In 2013, the major entitlement programs - Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and other health care consumed 49 percent of all federal spending. These programs, and interest on the debt, are on track to consume an even greater share of spending in future years, while the portion of federal spending dedicated to other national priorities will decline.
Population Decline and the Remaking of Great Power Politics
Book (Potomac Books Inc.)
Manifesto of the New Fatherhood — Esquire
The crisis of income inequality and the decline of social capital are the subjects of wide-ranging, furious debates. The quality of schools is the main subject of almost all local politics. Family structure matters more.
Developing a 'We' Culture — ChristianityToday.com
The author of "Bowling Alone," the famous 1995 essay on the decline of social capital—our connection to each other through activities and institutions—Putnam converted to Judaism in part because of its strong sense of community.
Human Security Report 2013: The Decline in Global Violence: Evidence, Explanation, and Contestation
Book (Human Security Press)
The Decline and Approaching Fall of the U.S.: When Social Security & Other Trust Funds Fail
The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream
Book (Oxford University Press)
Life insurance in retirement: when a spouse dies, the household's Social Security income will decline. This is but one retirement risk that life ... Insight): An article from: Best's Review
Book (Thomson Gale)