Child development and social Policy : Social Development

Child development and social Policy

In Child Development and
expands on Dr. Zigler's work in integrating the fields of child development and social policy, while using scientific knowledge for action as the model.

Contributors discuss these key questions:

  • What are the most powerful research insights of the last 30 years that promote effective action for children and families?
  • What are the most powerful constraints or limits of our knowledge base to promote effective action for children and families?
  • What are the primary components of short-term research agenda to make the most powerful difference for children and families?

This edited volume focuses on both the influence of social policy on children’s development and the unique perspective, insight, and skills that developmentalists bring to this policy and its formation. Programs to ensure good beginnings for all children are discussed, while the needs of those who are most vulnerable are also addressed.

Contributors

Foreword

Acknowledgments

Introduction
—J. Lawrence Aber and Deborah A. Phillips

I. Making History: Child Development and Social Policy

  1. Child Development Research and Public Policy: Triumphs and Setbacks on the Way to Maturity
    —Deborah A. Phillips and Sally J. Styfco
  2. Policy Looking to Research
    —Olivia Golden
  3. Bridging the Gap Between Research and Child Policy Change: The Role of Strategic Communications in Policy Advocacy
    —Janice Gruendel and J. Lawrence Aber
  4. Data for a Democracy: The Evolving Role of Evaluation in Policy and Program Development
    —Kathleen McCartney and Heather B. Weiss

II. Ensuring Good Beginnings for All Children

  1. Forty Years of Research Knowledge and Use: From Head Start to Early Head Start and Beyond
    —John M. Love, Rachel Chazan-Cohen, and Helen Raikes
  2. Beyond Baby Steps: Promoting the Growth and Development of U.S. Child Care Policy
    —Susan Muenchow and Katherine W. Marsland
  3. From Visions to Systems of Universal Prekindergarten
    —W. Steven Barnett, Kirsty C. Brown, Matia Finn-Stevenson, and Christopher Henrich
  4. Strategies to Ensure That No Child Starts From Behind
    —Deborah Stipek and Kenji Hakuta

III. Addressing the Needs of the Most Vulnerable Children and Families

  1. Poverty and Child Development: New Perspectives on a Defining Issue
    —J. Lawrence Aber, Stephanie M. Jones, and C. Cybele Raver
  2. Intervention and Policy Implications of Research on Neurobiological Functioning in Maltreated Children
    —Dante Cicchetti
  3. The Sexually Mature Teen as a Whole Person: New Directions in Prevention and Intervention for Teen Pregnancy and Parenthood
    —Joseph P. Allen, Victoria Seitz, and Nancy H. Apfel
  4. Children in Foster Care
    —Ellen E. Pinderhughes, Brenda Jones Harden, and Amanda E. Guyer

IV. Strengthening Children, Families, and Communities

  1. Parent Education: Lessons Inspired by Head Start
    —Larue Allen, Anita Sethi, Sheila Smith, and Jennifer Astuto
  2. Mental Health: A Neglected Partner in the Healthy Development of Young Children
    —Kathryn Taaffe McLearn, Jane Knitzer, and Alice S. Carter
  3. Family Support: A Force for Change
    —Sharon Lynn Kagan and Bernice Weissbourd
  4. Using the Web to Disseminate Research and Affect Public Policy
    —Fred Rothbaum, Nancy F. Martland, and Sandra J. Bishop-Josef

Epilogue: Combining Basic and Applied Science in Constructing Sound Social Policy

You might also like

China think tank: abandon one-child policy

by Citizen_J


Chinese think tank urges end to one-child policy
USA Today, Oct. 31, 2012
BEIJING (AP) — A Chinese government think tank is urging the country's leaders to start phasing out its one-child policy immediately and allow two children for every family by 2015, a daring proposal to do away with the unpopular policy.
Some demographers see the timeline put forward by the China Development Research Foundation as a bold move by the body close to the central leadership. Others warn that the gradual approach, if implemented, would still be insufficient to help correct the problems that China's strict birth limits have created

It's a question of society's priorities: child o

by o_absr_balance_the_risks

There is a now (as there was 30 years ago when I studied psychology where women were assumed to be dependent, needy, liars) a major backlash against women again who bring abuse of their children to the surface. Maybe you are not close enough or don't know what abuse is or haven't ever loved a victim of abuse.
The 90s has produced a lot of good research. We now know that children who are separated from their primary attachment figure (usually their mother) go through two stages: (1) protest, then (2) despair. In the protest stage, the heart rate and body temperature increase. Levels of catecholamine and cortisol increase causing the child to become hyper-vigilant until the child re-unites with its mother